Among other things, the electoral campaign in Spain revolves around, in its penultimate bars, around an almost philosophical debate on what is truth and lie. All as a result of an interview by Alberto Núñez Feijóo on TVE this Monday in which he repeatedly stated that the Rajoy government “had always revalued pensions”.
Although the mess, really, starts from a nuance that he added to that sentence: “According to the CPI”. This Tuesday, the popular candidate has accepted the error: “I do not lie, and if I say something that is not correct, it is not the result of a lie but of inaccuracy”. In an interview in Espejo Público, he has admitted that “there were years in which pensions were not updated according to the CPI.”
Said which, Feijóo has added: “I have accepted the inaccuracy immediately, because I do not like that the lie is installed; we have to rectify”. Later, he has contrasted his resounding slip, which the PSOE has elevated to the axis of the campaign, with the word of his adversary, Pedro Sánchez: “In my opinion, he does not distinguish the truth from the lie.”
Once the wrong was considered buried, the leader of the popular has once again clamored for truth in politics during another moment of his television appearance: “A good leader has to tell the truth to the people”. In this sense, it has vindicated the importance of “traceability”.
Asked about his main asset against the President of the Government, Feijóo has especially praised one: “I have been dedicated to the management of public affairs for 30 years”. On the other hand, he recalled that Sánchez “has only been an opposition councilor in the Madrid City Council” before arriving at Moncloa.
Regarding the final stretch of the campaign and the electoral result, the popular candidate has taken the victory of his party for granted: “It seems that he is going to get more seats and more votes than the PSOE” and has once again insisted on the main idea- strength that he left in his interview with EL ESPAÑOL: “I will call the PSOE to facilitate the investiture.”
In this sense, he has again marked distances with Vox: “I have nothing to do with that game”. And he has criticized that the green formation shows that it has “coinciding interests” with the PSOE. “What would the PSOE do without Vox, would it be left without an electoral campaign?”, he asked himself before explaining his theory on the distribution of votes and the disservice that, in his opinion, Vox does to the PP in some constituencies.
Apart from this, Feijóo has recalled for the umpteenth time that his main obsession is to govern alone. Because, in his opinion, “coalitions at this time are not the best for the country”. And to depend on Santiago Abascal, the popular candidate has once again entrusted himself to a “very powerful majority.”
The main leaders of the PP believe that it is possible to reach 165 seats. In fact, it is the goal set by Genoa to avoid any kind of coalition. Because “now it is more difficult to have an absolute majority,” Feijóo has acknowledged. Many factors influence, such as the presence of other parties in Congress, such as ERC or Bildu.
In any case, the popular ones continue to think that the current scenario has certain similarities with what happened in Andalusia a year ago. This is how Feijóo stressed today: “If we concentrate the vote of all those who want Sanchismo and the independence movement to stop governing, a very powerful majority can be achieved.”