Tag Archives: integrity

Ten Principles for Being a Real Man: A Call for Respect and Accountability

One. Learn to behave like a vase man. Every time the spotlight is on her(s), do whatever it takes to make her shine up. I mean, don’t do anything. Zero shadows: don’t get in the shot, don’t interrupt. Be polite.

Withdraw without withdrawing your attention. It’s their time, not yours. You are not more important. Take a step back and bask in your happiness.

Of the. Always respect their space (and their spaces), even more so when you have a hierarchical position of power. Do what’s right, be right.

No euphoric state justifies impoliteness. Internalizing that principle entails assuming, of course, that no episode of anger or rage legitimizes you to act like an animal..

Three. Listen to anyone who tells you that you may have acted inappropriately. Being a real man consists (among many other things) in knowing that one cannot always be right, that listening is necessary and that the discomfort generated should never be underestimated, be empathic.

It could be your mother, it could be your sister, it could be your partner and it could also be your daughter.

Four. Apologize immediately: Take full responsibility, with no nuances and no excuses. Be straight. Blaming the woman who feels assaulted or abused is very demeaning for her, but also for you (even if you are the least of it).

No alibi is admissible, all increase the damage you have caused and reduce your honor to rubble. Even more so when the profile is public and there is an obligation not to set a bad example.

Five. Always keep in mind that only a wretch victimizes himself. Be whole. This resource, so typical of the violent aggressor, so rudely narcissistic, shows that you have not understood anything, that you do not feel concerned about what happened and that, as a consequence, you may commit a similar mistake in the future.

Six. Never resort to any kind of diversionary maneuver. Your case is your case. If you are an adult to make your mistake, you are also an adult not to dilute your guilt. Be fair.

Of course, feminism is not living its best moment, but this evidence does not make machismo any less despicable and, needless to say, it does not provide a certificate of impunity for committing macho acts.

Attacking feminists to normalize abuse encourages the worst violence and that deserves unequivocal social repudiation.

Seven. No hiding behind anyone. Not with the subordinates, less with the couple and, of course, never after the daughters. Doing it is not clean, it is not decent and it will bring bills in the future.

The first apology is due to the victim and the second, to all the women who accompany you. Put to genitalize, the true balls are shown when facing adversity with a minimum of dignity. Be brave.

Eight. Try to understand that manhood is about protecting and that machismo causes the exact opposite, suffering. be thoughtful. If you can only offer an egotistical manual of resistance to your environment, your organization and your country, you are a defeated and destructive type. Be generous.

If nothing matters more to you than your ass, you can’t conceive of the damage you’re generating around you, you can’t realize that you’ve become a problem and you can’t detect that your salvation has already become impossible, so you’ll dig deeper.

Nine: integrity is demonstrated by raising one’s voice in the face of any aggression, especially in the face of abuse of power and, above all, when the person who breaks the silence is downstairs.

Always be accomplices of courageous women and encourage others. We have to accompany them all, shoulder to shoulder but one step behind. There are few players who have shown the essential solidarity that their teammates deserve, they do have manhood. Everyone else, including everyone on my team, has yet to learn many of the most valuable things in life.

Ten: Manhood is demonstrated by pushing away the man who behaves disrespectfully. be honest. Looking the other way, laughing at the joke, celebrating or applauding the unacceptable implies acting in a herd mode and that reduces man to the level of a sheep.

It is the image left by the assembly of Spanish football and those foundations must be changed. Calculating money, compromising, letting yourself be subjugated by a superior without moral authority, implies sinking into the deepest and most irreparable poverty. You will forever be slaves. No one can be free if you don’t defend the freedom of women.

It’s a shame to have to tell it at this point. Let’s see if at least our children manage to internalize what our mothers wanted to transmit to us. I am writing this so that mine can read it and know, tomorrow, how to behave like a real man.

Enhancing Whistleblower Protection and Collaboration in the Fight Against Corruption

The fight against corruption in modern societies requires behaviors in addition to those of a pure regulatory framework in the penal or administrative sanctioning field.

To put it more clearly: the criminal reproach and, therefore, the administrative one have become insufficient to achieve a fight against pathological behaviors in the field of public corruption, first, and corruption between individuals, a posteriori.

The insufficiency derives from a host of factors ranging from the sophistication of the offender in the formulation of the crime to the ability to operate in countries where there are no conventional judicial relationships or where legal relationships are established in an unconventional manner..

This has led to a reduction in the degree of effectiveness of the police and judicial systems, no matter how much progress has been made in the regulations that regulate both areas..

From the verification of this reality, the eyes of the world, especially the Anglo-Saxon and the European Union itself, turned towards individuals. It was suggested that the effectiveness of this fight would only progress from citizen collaboration.

This consideration has forced, in turn, to reformulate the legal techniques for the protection of people who collaborate in the discovery of conducts that find a criminal or administrative classification..

In this context, as we say, the collaboration of the complainant is sought. The first technique that is imported from the field of competition is the one related to the reduction of the degree of responsibility and the sanction of the collaborating whistleblower.

The denunciation of the collaborator passes to our legislation and today is contemplated in the procedural norms of a common nature.

It is true, however, that the spectrum of collaboration could be broader than that referring to the one who has participated in the events and seeks their exculpation. Society as a whole has or can have a relevant role in this collaboration.

This is where the so-called complaint channels arise.. European legislation dedicated, initially, a series of efforts to encourage -more or less euphemistically speaking- the creation and management of channels.

But it is quickly observed that some elements of effectiveness suffer if the identity of the complainant can be known and, therefore, the possibilities of increasing the number are limited, especially if elements of coercion or retaliation begin to be appreciated.

This has led the Spanish legislator to issue Law 2/2023, of February 20, regulating the protection of people who report on regulatory violations and the fight against corruption. This law incorporates into Spanish Law Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council, of October 23, 2019.

Now the approach is broader as established in Article 1 of the same when it states that (the) “… purpose of granting adequate protection against reprisals that may be suffered by natural persons who report any of the actions or omissions to which referred to in article 2, through the procedures set forth therein…”.

Determination that is specified with the indication of the provisions in section 2 when it indicates that “… Its purpose is also to strengthen the culture of information, of the integrity infrastructures of organizations and the promotion of the culture of information or Communication as a mechanism to prevent and detect threats to the public interest…”.

It is true that the norm has a broader content than the simple protection. In this sense, the creation of an independent authority that must solve complaints of retaliation stands out, but also that can become an external channel that, with the guarantees of the public sphere, is the instrument for processing the complaints themselves.

This model of strong public commitment to the creation of an independent body and the linking of public resources to the denunciation system has created a relational framework with substantive administrative procedures (in which corruption may have occurred or in which the determination of responsibility against it) and, eventually, in the criminal field when the conducts in question affect this area of reproach.

This relational scope transcends the central objective of whistleblower protection to be inserted in the creation of a specific organization at the service of the fight against corruption.

The most obvious proof is that the Autonomous Community of Catalonia attributes, on an organic level, this competence to the Anti-Fraud Office.

This demonstrates that the relational sphere, beyond the protection of the whistleblower, is yet to be built and delimited.

This will be the work of the coming years and the effectiveness of the measures contemplated in the new regulation will depend, to a large extent, on its final operation.